Increased prevalence of endocervical Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma colonization in infertile women with tubal factor.

OBJECTIVE: Most women suffering from tubal factor infertility do not have a history of pelvic inflammatory disease, but rather have asymptomatic upper genital tract infection. Investigating the impacts of such infections, even in the absence of clinically confirmed pelvic inflammatory disease, is critical to understanding the tubal factor of infertility. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of endocervical bacteria is associated with tubal factors in women screened for infertility. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved 245 women undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG), screened for endocervical colonization by Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis, as part of a routine female infertility investigation between 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: endocervical bacterial colonization by Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealiticum, Mycoplasma hominis and other bacteria corresponded to 3.7%, 9.0%; 5.7% and 9.8%, respectively. There was no colonization by Neisseria gonorrhea. The prevalence of tubal factor was significantly higher in patients with positive endocervical bacteria colonization, regardless of bacterial species. When evaluating bacteria species individually, the women who were positive for endocervical Mycoplasma hominis had significantly higher rates of tubal factor. Associations between endocervical bacterial colonization and tubal factor infertility were confirmed by multiple regression analysis adjusted for age and duration of infertility. CONCLUSION: Besides the higher prevalence of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infectious agents, the findings of this study suggest the possible association of endocervical bacterial colonization - not only Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea, but also Mycoplasma species with tubal performance.

Estimulação ovariana em usuárias do sistema intrauterino liberador de levonorgestrel para preservação de fertilidade / Ovarian stimulation in users of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system for fertility preservation

O objetivo deste estudo foi buscar evidências sobre a interferência do uso do SIU-LNG em mulheres submetidas a ciclos de hiperestimulação ovariana para preservação de fertilidade. Através de uma revisão integrativa, com busca nas bases de dados Lilacs, Pubmed e Cochrane, utilizamos algumas palavras-chaves, relacionando inicialmente 43 artigos, totalizando após aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão em 30 estudos. Os artigos abordados foram selecionados baseados nos itens: autor principal, ano de publicação, desenho do estudo, nível de evidência científica e assunto principal. Os estudos foram separados conforme os seguintes temas de abrangência: preservação de fertilidade, preservação de fertilidade e métodos contraceptivos, SIU-LNG e preservação de fertilidade, SIU-LNG e farmacocinética e SIU-LNG e gestação. Existem poucos estudos na literatura avaliando mulheres usuárias do SIU-LNG submetidas à estimulação ovariana em ciclos de reprodução assistida. Em dois estudos disponíveis, ambos com doadoras de oócitos, não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre as doadoras usuárias do SIU-LNG em relação aos controles, quando comparados os parâmetros descritos: número de ampolas de gonadotrofinas utilizadas na estimulação, número de folículos recrutados, número de oócitos, taxas de fertilização, taxas de clivagem e número de embriões por receptora. O impacto do uso do SIU-LNG em mulheres submetidas à estimulação ovariana em ciclos de preservação oocitária ainda não está claro, assim como o protocolo ideal. As evidências atuais são insuficientes para definir o real efeito do uso do SIU-LNG durante os ciclos de estimulação ovariana. Entretanto, o SIU-LNG não parece ter efeito negativo sobre o crescimento folicular, sobre a qualidade oocitária e a qualidade embrionária, podendo ser utilizado durante este processo. Há a necessidade de estudos randomizados controlados avaliando uma nova opção terapêutica nos ciclos de reprodução assistida.(AU)

The objective of this study was to search for evidence on the interference of the use of LNG-SIU in women submitted to cycles of ovarian hyperstimulation for preservation of fertility, through an integrative review, with search in the databases Lilacs, Pubmed and Cochrane. Using related keywords 43 articles were examined, totaling, after inclusion and exclusion criteria, in 30 studies. The articles were classified according to a synoptic table organized in topics: main author, year of publication, study design, level of scientific evidence and main subject. The studies were separated according to the topics covered: preservation of fertility, preservation of fertility, and contraceptive methods, SIU-LNG and preservation of fertility, SIU-LNG and pharmacokinetics and SIU-LNG and gestation. It was observed that there are few studies in the literature evaluating women users of LNG-IUS who undergo ovarian stimulation in cycles of assisted reproduction. In two of them, both induding oocyte donors, no statistically significant differences were observed among donors using the LNG-IUS as compared to controls regarding the described parameters: number of gonadotrophin ampules used in stimulation, number of recruited follicles, number of oocytes, fertilization rates, cleavage rates and number of embryos per recipient. The impact of the use of IUS-LNG in women submitted to ovarian stimulation in oocyte preservation cycles is still unclear, as it is the ideal protocol. Current evidence is insufficient to define the real effect of the use of LNG-SIU during cycles of ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproduction. However, although there is little research available, the LNGSIU does not seem to have a negative effect on follicular growth, on oocyte quality and on embryo quality, and it can be used during this process. There is a need for randomized controlled trials and other research in this context to evaluate a new therapeutic option in the cycles of assisted reproduction.(AU)

Microlaparoscopy vs. conventional laparoscopy for the management of early-stage pelvic endometriosis: a comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of microlaparoscopy vs. conventional laparoscopy in the management of patients with early-stage pelvic endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective, randomized study we evaluated 54 patients with a clinical diagnosis of stage I and II pelvic endometriosis according to the classification of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, revised in 1996. The patients were divided into 3 groups and underwent, respectively, microlaparoscopy under sedation, microlaparoscopy under general anesthesia and conventional laparoscopy for definitive diagnosis and treatment of the disease. RESULTS: Microlaparoscopy caused less pain, required lower consumption of analgesics and permitted a faster return to daily activities. Sedation decreased the incidence of nausea, vomiting and oropharyngeal pain. Microlaparoscopy under sedation led to a shorter hospital stay and reduced cost. CONCLUSION: Microlaparoscopy under sedation is a viable alternative for the management of patients with suspected early-stage pelvic endometriosis.

Microlaparoscopy in gynecology: analysis of 16 cases and review of literature

Microlaparoscopy represents the development of endoscopic surgery towards a minimally invasive surgical procedure. The advantages include fewer surgical complications, faster return to daily activities, more comfortable postoperative recovery, and satisfactory aesthetic results. The possibility of performing surgery under sedation may result in shorter hospitalization, lower hospital costs, and easier anesthetic procedures. The authors report their preliminary experience with the use of microlaparoscopy, using optics and 2mm instruments, as well as a review of the literature since the introduction of this new technique. The report of these 16 cases demonstrates that microlaparoscopy is a feasible technique with satisfactory results. On the other hand, this new technique requires precise indications and a training period for the development of the skills necessary for performing these surgeries

Aspectos terapeuticos da dismenorreia primária / Therapeutic aspects of primary dismenorrhea

A dismenorreia primária é um dos disturbios mais frequentes em ginecologia, sendo um dos principais responsáveis por falta ao estudo e ao trabalho. A sua fisiopatologia esta ligada a uma atividade uterina incoordenada, sendo implicados um desbalanco hormonal, e uma secreçäo aumentada de prostaglandinas e hormonio anti-diurético...